Megan E. Vanneman

909 citations
62 papers · 599 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Megan E. Vanneman

58 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Megan E. Vanneman
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Health Professions 228
  • Emergency Medical Services 30
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 7
  • Economics and Econometrics 78
  • Health Information Management 12
Replace Paul Dreyer with:
Paul Dreyer United States
Jennifer Adams United States
Paul W. Bush United States
Rachel French United States
Margaret Hodge United States
J Szecsenyi Germany
Lori Rutman United States
Jennifer L. Bacci United States
Mieke van der Biezen Netherlands
N. Ikegami Japan
Megan E. Vanneman relative to Paul Dreyer United States Paul Dreyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×54.5×
Paul Dreyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan E. Vanneman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan E. Vanneman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan E. Vanneman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan E. Vanneman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan E. Vanneman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan E. Vanneman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan E. Vanneman. The network helps show where Megan E. Vanneman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan E. Vanneman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan E. Vanneman Line = papers co-authored together Megan E. Vanneman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202045
2 201831
3 201931
4 201723
5 201123
6 201722
7 202022
8 202020
9 202020
10 201119
11 201719
12 202217
13 202316
14 201116
15 201714
16 201813
17 202213
18 202112
19 202112
20 201812

About Megan E. Vanneman

Megan E. Vanneman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 62 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (22 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (13 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (228 citations), Emergency Medical Services (30 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (7 citations), Economics and Econometrics (78 citations) and Health Information Management (12 citations). Megan E. Vanneman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Todd H. Wagner, Amy K. Rosen, Michael Shwartz, Alex H. S. Harris, Helen Halpin, Jean Yoon, Arnold Milstein, Stephen M. Shortell, Ciaran S. Phibbs and Warren Pettey. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, Health Services Research, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Health Affairs and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact