M.E. Watts

38 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

M.E. Watts
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Cancer Research 514
  • Biophysics 133
  • Pharmaceutical Science 131
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 329
  • Radiation 119
Replace Carey E. Smithen with:
Carey E. Smithen United Kingdom
G.E. Adams United Kingdom
Ruth Roots United States
Katherine A. Kennedy United States
Rashi S. Iyer United States
Ning Y. Yu United States
Roger F. Martin Australia
K. R. Weishaupt United States
Benoît Paquette Canada
Archie W. Prestayko United States
M.E. Watts relative to Carey E. Smithen United Kingdom Carey E. Smithen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Carey E. Smithen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.E. Watts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.E. Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.E. Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.E. Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.E. Watts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.E. Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.E. Watts. The network helps show where M.E. Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.E. Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.E. Watts Line = papers co-authored together M.E. Watts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976265
2 1979207
3 1974206
4 198097
5 197396
6 197595
7 197991
8 198586
9 199367
10 198656
11 201251
12
Effects of novel and conventional anti-cancer agents on human endothelial permeability: influence of tumour secreted factors.
199739
13 197234
14 197833
15 198032
16 197530
17 198526
18 197521
19 198217
20 197816

About M.E. Watts

M.E. Watts is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Biophysics, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (9 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (8 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (7 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (6 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (5 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (3 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (3 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (514 citations), Biophysics (133 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (131 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (329 citations) and Radiation (119 citations). M.E. Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brunei. Frequent co-authors include G.E. Adams, Carey E. Smithen, Peter Wardman, Ian James Stratford, J.C. Asquith, Ian R. Flockhart, Raymond G. Wallace, G.E. Adams, Kanti B. Patel and Malcolm Woodcock. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Research, British Journal of Radiology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Nuclear Medicine and In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact