Philip Gray

2.4k citations
85 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Gray

77 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Philip Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Human-Computer Interaction 635
  • Software 93
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 382
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 366
  • Information Systems and Management 72
Replace Roman Bednarik with:
Roman Bednarik Finland
Marco Winckler France
Pablo Moreno‐Ger Spain
Adam Fourney United States
Hugo Fukś Brazil
Richard M. Young United Kingdom
Paolo Buono Italy
Bjoern Hartmann United States
Robert A. Virzi United States
Siti Salwah Salim Malaysia
Philip Gray relative to Roman Bednarik Finland Roman Bednarik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roman Bednarik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Gray. The network helps show where Philip Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Gray Line = papers co-authored together Philip Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008230
2 2000182
3 2001118
4 199294
5 197990
6 200488
7 200887
8 200676
9 200159
10
Can You Feel the Force? An Investigation of Haptic Collaboration in Shared Editors
200158
11 200056
12
Using Field Experiments to Evaluate Mobile Guides
200453
13 200149
14 200246
15 200245
16 200639
17 198736
18 199931
19 200325
20 198724

About Philip Gray

Philip Gray is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (23 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (16 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (13 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (9 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (7 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (5 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (635 citations), Software (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (382 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (366 citations) and Information Systems and Management (72 citations). Philip Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Brewster, Ian Oakley, Daniel Salber, Joy Goodman, H. Rex Hartson, Emmanuel Dubois, M. Sage, Morven Miller, Nora Kearney and Joemon M. Jose. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, Supportive Care in Cancer, Neuropharmacology, Seminars in Oncology and Biochemical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact