J.C. Asquith

13 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

J.C. Asquith
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cancer Research 189
  • Pharmaceutical Science 47
  • Biophysics 44
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 122
  • Radiation 43
Replace S. Gulyás with:
S. Gulyás Canada
Reidar Oftebro Norway
Myles Astor United States
Ruth Jacobs United Kingdom
A. J. Moss United States
W.E. Kisieleski United States
P.V. Hariharan United States
Maryse Rapp France
Gary F. Strniste United States
Kanematsu Sugiura United States
J.C. Asquith relative to S. Gulyás Canada S. Gulyás's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
S. Gulyás · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.C. Asquith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.C. Asquith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.C. Asquith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.C. Asquith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.C. Asquith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.C. Asquith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.C. Asquith. The network helps show where J.C. Asquith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside J.C. Asquith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.C. Asquith Line = papers co-authored together J.C. Asquith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1974181
2 1971137
3 197499
4 197584
5 197227
6 197714
7 19747
8 19804
9 19823
10
Electron-affinic sensitizers for hypoxic cells irradiated in vitro and in vivo: current status
19743
11 19783
12 19901
13 19981

About J.C. Asquith

J.C. Asquith is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (1 paper) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (189 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (47 citations), Biophysics (44 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (122 citations) and Radiation (43 citations). J.C. Asquith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include G.E. Adams, M.E. Watts, R. L. Willson, C. E. Smithen, Josh Foster, K B Patel, D. L. Dewey, James A. McFadzean, R. M. J. Ings and Mohan Shenoy. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Research, British Journal of Radiology, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis and Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact