G.E. Adams

176 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Peers

G.E. Adams
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Biophysics 598
  • Cancer Research 1.4k
  • Toxicology 239
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 562
  • Electrochemistry 360
Replace Nicholas E. Geacintov with:
Nicholas E. Geacintov United States
Zijian Guo China
Albert S. Mildvan United States
Sankaran Subramanian India
Douglas C. Rees United States
Trevor W. Hambley Australia
J. Peisach United States
James E. Trosko United States
Christopher S. Foote United States
F. Scott Mathews United States
G.E. Adams relative to Nicholas E. Geacintov United States Nicholas E. Geacintov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Nicholas E. Geacintov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.E. Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.E. Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.E. Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.E. Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.E. Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.E. Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.E. Adams. The network helps show where G.E. Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.E. Adams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.E. Adams Line = papers co-authored together G.E. Adams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 179 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972211
2 1977201
3 1976194
4 1969193
5 1974181
6 1979172
7 1969170
8 1971158
9 1967155
10 1963152
11 1976141
12 1971137
13
Understanding research methods
1985134
14 1965129
15 1973125
16 1976124
17 1968118
18 1969111
19 197699
20 196588

About G.E. Adams

G.E. Adams is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biophysics, having authored 179 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (37 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (26 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (26 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (18 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (18 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (13 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (598 citations), Cancer Research (1.4k citations), Toxicology (239 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (562 citations) and Electrochemistry (360 citations). G.E. Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Ian J. Stratford, R. L. Willson, R. B. Cundall, M.E. Watts, J. W. Boag, J. Leslie Redpath, Marcus S. Cooke, Peter Wardman, D. L. Dewey and Jacob N. Israelachvili. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiation Research, International Journal of Radiation Biology, Nature and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact