Max Schleser

38 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Max Schleser
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Communication 42
  • Speech and Hearing 32
  • Human-Computer Interaction 28
  • Museology 17
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
Replace Noah Lenstra with:
Noah Lenstra United States
Josè Manuel Pérez Tornero Spain
Thomas de Lange Norway
Normah Mustaffa Malaysia
Zanda Rubene Latvia
Mark O’Brien United Kingdom
Hanna Vuojärvi Finland
Stephanie Orme United States
Ross Perkins United States
Manuel Montes Vozmediano Spain
Max Schleser relative to Noah Lenstra United States Noah Lenstra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Noah Lenstra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Schleser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Schleser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Schleser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Schleser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Schleser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Schleser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Schleser. The network helps show where Max Schleser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Max Schleser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Schleser Line = papers co-authored together Max Schleser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201453
2 200931
3 201414
4 201812
5 201510
6 202110
7 20219
8 20178
9 20218
10
Pasifika Prediabetes Youth Empowerment Programme: learnings from a youth-led community-based intervention study.
20218
11 20188
12 20207
13 20187
14 20206
15
Mobile-mentary: Mobile documentaries in the mediascape
20116
16 20205
17 20184
18 20133
19 20213
20 20223

About Max Schleser

Max Schleser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Speech and Hearing, Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 45 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (14 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (9 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (7 papers), Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Community Health and Development (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers) and Multimedia Communication and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (42 citations), Speech and Hearing (32 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (28 citations), Museology (17 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Max Schleser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marsha Berry, Camille Baker, Ridvan Firestone, Hilary Davis, Anthony McCosker, Diana Bossio, Lis Ellison‐Loschmann, Anna Matheson, Susan Kerrigan and Barry Borman. Their work appears in journals such as AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Studies in Documentary Film and Journal of sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact