Max Elden

1.0k citations
15 papers · 533 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Max Elden

11 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Max Elden
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 114
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 70
  • Management Science and Operations Research 108
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 17
  • Management Information Systems 51
Replace Paul Brewerton with:
Paul Brewerton United Kingdom
Richard Ennals United Kingdom
Jan de Leede Netherlands
Jaime Ortega Spain
Michael Arena United States
Jan Löwstedt Sweden
Alma Whiteley Australia
Maria Rita Tagliaventi Italy
R.W. Revans United Kingdom
Stefano Borzillo France
Max Elden relative to Paul Brewerton United Kingdom Paul Brewerton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Paul Brewerton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Elden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Elden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Elden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Elden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Elden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Elden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Elden. The network helps show where Max Elden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Max Elden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Elden Line = papers co-authored together Max Elden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1993290
2 199399
3 200449
4 198641
5 200113
6 199212
7 200812
8 19876
9 19835
10 19963
11 20101
12 19941
13
Constructed realities: Therapy, theory and research
19931
14 19920
15 19860

About Max Elden

Max Elden is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organizational Learning and Leadership (3 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper) and Quality and Supply Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (114 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (70 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (108 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (17 citations) and Management Information Systems (51 citations). Max Elden has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Rupert F. Chisholm, Kevin C. Wooten, William Foote Whyte, Lee Revere, Robert A. Bartsch, Steven L. Sanders, Roger Durand, Kenneth J. Gergen, John Shotter and Mary Gergen. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Academy of Management Review, Human Relations, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science and Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact