Maureen Docherty

484 citations
24 papers · 412 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Maureen Docherty

24 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Maureen Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 271
  • Developmental Neuroscience 32
  • Neurology 58
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Cell Biology 59
Replace Marie‐Françoise Diebler with:
Marie‐Françoise Diebler France
Kuei-Sen Hsu Taiwan
Chiung-Chun Huang Taiwan
Alessandro Ciamei Italy
Paolo Migani Italy
Teruyuki Fukushima Japan
NC Brecha United States
K Kolasa United States
Jian Zhi Wang China
Nicole Feldmann Germany
Maureen Docherty relative to Marie‐Françoise Diebler France Marie‐Françoise Diebler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Marie‐Françoise Diebler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maureen Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maureen Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maureen Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maureen Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maureen Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maureen Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maureen Docherty. The network helps show where Maureen Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maureen Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maureen Docherty Line = papers co-authored together Maureen Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987108
2 199078
3 198845
4 198521
5 198617
6 198217
7 198816
8 198713
9 198813
10 198313
11 198912
12 19899
13 19919
14 19859
15 19867
16
Genes for neurotransmitter synthesis, storage, and uptake.
19857
17 19915
18 19824
19 19883
20 19862

About Maureen Docherty

Maureen Docherty is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (6 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (4 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (271 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (32 citations), Neurology (58 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations) and Cell Biology (59 citations). Maureen Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include H. F. Bradford, Jang‐Yen Wu, Joanne Taylor, Phillip R. Gordon‐Weeks, Brian Anderton, Tong H. Joh, John Hardy, Bruce S. McEwen, P. Foley and Victoria N. Luine. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, FEBS Letters, Journal of Neurochemistry, Neurochemical Research and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact