Maud Combe
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Genetics top 10%
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Papers in
- Genetics 10
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 10
-
- Plant and animal studies 5
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 3
- Co-authors
- Guy Théraulaz (6 shared papers)Martín Giurfa (3 shared papers)Simon Garnier (3 shared papers)Aurore Avarguès‐Weber (1 shared paper)Adrian G. Dyer (1 shared paper)Christian Jost (3 shared papers)A. Grimal (1 shared paper)Jacques Gautrais (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Maud Combe
12 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 227
- Genetics 237
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 129
- Insect Science 62
- Computer Networks and Communications 63
Countries citing papers authored by Maud Combe
This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Combe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Combe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Combe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Combe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Combe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Combe. The network helps show where Maud Combe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maud Combe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 8 |
About Maud Combe
Maud Combe is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (227 citations), Genetics (237 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (129 citations), Insect Science (62 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (63 citations). Maud Combe has collaborated with scholars based in France, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guy Théraulaz, Martín Giurfa, Simon Garnier, Aurore Avarguès‐Weber, Adrian G. Dyer, Christian Jost, A. Grimal, Jacques Gautrais, Vincent Fourcassié and Jean‐Christophe Sandoz. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Scientific Reports, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Current Biology and PLoS Computational Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.