Imen Saïd

730 citations
11 papers · 534 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Insect and Pesticide Research 3
    • Insect Pheromone Research and Control 3
    • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 6

Imen Saïd

11 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers

Imen Saïd
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Insect Science 118
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 160
  • Genetics 197
  • Developmental Biology 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 71
Replace Stéphane Canonge with:
Stéphane Canonge Belgium
Tim Landgraf Germany
Grégory Sempo Belgium
Sepideh Bazazi United States
Stamatios C. Nicolis Belgium
V. Durier France
Jean-Marc Amé Belgium
Jean-Louis Deneubourg Belgium
A. Grimal France
Maud Combe France
Imen Saïd relative to Stéphane Canonge Belgium Stéphane Canonge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Stéphane Canonge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Imen Saïd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Imen Saïd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imen Saïd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imen Saïd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Imen Saïd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imen Saïd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imen Saïd. The network helps show where Imen Saïd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Imen Saïd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Imen Saïd Line = papers co-authored together Imen Saïd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2007358
2 200368
3 200545
4 200520
5 200514
6 20118
7 20158
8 20177
9 20182
10 20172
11 20182

About Imen Saïd

Imen Saïd is a scholar working on Insect Science, Genetics, Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Date Palm Research Studies (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (118 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (160 citations), Genetics (197 citations), Developmental Biology (10 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (71 citations). Imen Saïd has collaborated with scholars based in France, Tunisia and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Colette Rivault, Roland Siegwart, Masoud Asadpour, Jean‐Louis Deneubourg, Claire Detrain, Stéphane Canonge, José Halloy, Grégory Sempo, Florin Tache and Jean-Marc Amé. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Journal of Food Biochemistry, Science and Animal Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact