Matthew Reimer

662 citations
23 papers · 459 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Reimer

23 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Matthew Reimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Global and Planetary Change 233
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 113
  • Ecology 118
  • Economics and Econometrics 107
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32
Replace José María Da Rocha with:
José María Da Rocha Spain
Gunnar Knapp United States
Andries Richter Netherlands
Kieran Kelleher United States
Florian Diekert Norway
Danielle N. Edwards Canada
Helen Ding Italy
Stephen Kasperski United States
A. Neiland United Kingdom
Steven F. Edwards United States
Matthew Reimer relative to José María Da Rocha Spain José María Da Rocha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
José María Da Rocha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Reimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Reimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Reimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Reimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Reimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Reimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Reimer. The network helps show where Matthew Reimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Reimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Reimer Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Reimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201568
2 201761
3 201452
4 201937
5 201435
6 201730
7 201824
8 201923
9 201719
10 202116
11 201915
12 201812
13 202311
14 201810
15 20229
16 20197
17 20177
18 20186
19 20215
20 20174

About Matthew Reimer

Matthew Reimer is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 23 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (12 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (4 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (3 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (233 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (113 citations), Ecology (118 citations), Economics and Econometrics (107 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (32 citations). Matthew Reimer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Alan C. Haynie, Jessica K. Abbott, James E. Wilen, Joshua K. Abbott, Gunnar Knapp, Suresh A. Sethi, James N. Sanchirico, Kailin Kroetz, Daniel K. Lew and Erik R. Schoen. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Resource Economics, Marine Policy, Land Economics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact