Michael Springborn

41 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael Springborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Modeling and Simulation 550
  • Ecological Modeling 106
  • Health 127
  • Ecology 386
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 177
Replace Antonio López‐Quílez with:
Antonio López‐Quílez Spain
Nina H. Fefferman United States
Eli P. Fenichel United States
Lorenzo Mari Italy
Renato Casagrandi Italy
Colin J. Carlson United States
David Finnoff United States
Benjamin D. Dalziel United States
Brian M. Napoletano Mexico
Luca Carraro Switzerland
Michael Springborn relative to Antonio López‐Quílez Spain Antonio López‐Quílez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Antonio López‐Quílez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Springborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Springborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Springborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Springborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Springborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Springborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Springborn. The network helps show where Michael Springborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Springborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Springborn Line = papers co-authored together Michael Springborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011313
2 2020294
3 2019200
4 2021145
5 200777
6 201474
7 201465
8 201541
9 201139
10 201037
11 202231
12 202131
13 201128
14 202124
15 201124
16 201221
17 201419
18 201319
19 201418
20 201315

About Michael Springborn

Michael Springborn is a scholar working on Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Insect Science, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (6 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (5 papers), Water resources management and optimization (4 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (550 citations), Ecological Modeling (106 citations), Health (127 citations), Ecology (386 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (177 citations). Michael Springborn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gerardo Chowell, Joakim Weill, Olivier Deschênes, Matthieu Stigler, Eli P. Fenichel, Reuben P. Keller, James N. Sanchirico, Charles Perrings, Carlos Castillo‐Chávez and Christina M. Romagosa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, American Journal of Agricultural Economics and Environmental and Resource Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact