Matthew Ascott

1.6k citations
38 papers · 933 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Ascott

33 papers receiving 915 citations

Peers

Matthew Ascott
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 355
  • Water Science and Technology 414
  • Environmental Chemistry 284
  • Environmental Engineering 289
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 87
Replace Lærke Thorling with:
Lærke Thorling Denmark
Henry M. Johnson United States
Rob Ward United Kingdom
David W. Anning United States
Muhammad Yousuf Jat Baloch China
Joachim Rozemeijer Netherlands
Luc Rock Canada
Christopher L. Shope United States
Michael J. Donn Australia
Yuliya Vystavna France
Matthew Ascott relative to Lærke Thorling Denmark Lærke Thorling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lærke Thorling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Ascott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Ascott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Ascott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Ascott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Ascott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Ascott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Ascott. The network helps show where Matthew Ascott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Ascott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Ascott Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Ascott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017287
2 201597
3 201892
4 201651
5 202147
6 201543
7 201637
8 201536
9 201930
10 201728
11 202027
12 202120
13 201619
14 202016
15 202213
16 201810
17 202210
18 201910
19 20208
20 20238

About Matthew Ascott

Matthew Ascott is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Geochemistry and Petrology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering, having authored 38 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (19 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (19 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (13 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (6 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (6 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (6 papers), Climate variability and models (4 papers) and Water Treatment and Disinfection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (355 citations), Water Science and Technology (414 citations), Environmental Chemistry (284 citations), Environmental Engineering (289 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (87 citations). Matthew Ascott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Daren C. Gooddy, Marianne Stuart, Rob Ward, Melinda Lewis, Andrew Binley, Dan Lapworth, L Wang, Ben Surridge, David Macdonald and Adrian L. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Hydrology, Hydrogeology Journal, Hydrological Processes and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact