Mathilde G. E. Verdam

54 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Mathilde G. E. Verdam
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Family Practice 8
  • Surgery 164
  • General Health Professions 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
Replace Erin Mathieu with:
Erin Mathieu Australia
James N. Lau United States
Denise W. Gee United States
Ji Young Lim South Korea
Quang A. Le United States
Cara A. Liebert United States
Stephanie Archer United Kingdom
Monika M. Wahi United States
Josefa González‐Santos Spain
Kavita Sail United States
Mathilde G. E. Verdam relative to Erin Mathieu Australia Erin Mathieu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Erin Mathieu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathilde G. E. Verdam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathilde G. E. Verdam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathilde G. E. Verdam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathilde G. E. Verdam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathilde G. E. Verdam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathilde G. E. Verdam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathilde G. E. Verdam. The network helps show where Mathilde G. E. Verdam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathilde G. E. Verdam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathilde G. E. Verdam Line = papers co-authored together Mathilde G. E. Verdam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202070
2 201556
3 201752
4 201638
5 201735
6 201331
7 201530
8 201229
9 201629
10 201928
11 201228
12 201327
13 201926
14 201924
15 201923
16 202121
17 201320
18 201718
19 201617
20 202017

About Mathilde G. E. Verdam

Mathilde G. E. Verdam is a scholar working on Surgery, Management Science and Operations Research, General Health Professions, Oncology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 863 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers) and Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (27 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Surgery (164 citations), General Health Professions (92 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations). Mathilde G. E. Verdam has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frans J. Oort, Ellen M.A. Smets, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Marij A. Hillen, Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes, Nadine Bol, Terrence D. Jorgensen, Suzanne Jak, Judith A.F. Huirne and W. J. H. J. Meijerink. Their work appears in journals such as Quality of Life Research, Patient Education and Counseling, Surgical Endoscopy, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and BMC Medical Research Methodology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact