Mary Pay
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 4
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 2
-
- Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds 1
- Co-authors
- Roy A.E. Bakay (5 shared papers)Mark H. Tuszynski (5 shared papers)J. M. Conner (3 shared papers)David P. Salmon (3 shared papers)Jeffrey H. Kordower (2 shared papers)Steven G. Potkin (3 shared papers)Clifford W. Shults (2 shared papers)Richard Haas (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurology (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (2 papers)JAMA Neurology (1 paper)Journal of Molecular Neuroscience (1 paper)Nature Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary Pay
9 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Mary Pay's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Developmental Neuroscience 293
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 746
- Neurology 194
- Neurology 333
- Physiology 471
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Pay
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Pay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Pay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Pay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Pay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Pay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Pay. The network helps show where Mary Pay may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Pay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer disease Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 873 |
| 2 | 1995 | 372 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 249 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 194 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 1 |
About Mary Pay
Mary Pay is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Pharmacology and Physiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (1 paper) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (293 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (746 citations), Neurology (194 citations), Neurology (333 citations) and Physiology (471 citations). Mary Pay has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy A.E. Bakay, Mark H. Tuszynski, J. M. Conner, David P. Salmon, Jeffrey H. Kordower, Steven G. Potkin, Clifford W. Shults, Richard Haas, Lawrence A. Hansen and Leon J. Thal. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, JAMA Neurology, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience and Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.