Mary Flaherty

826 citations
50 papers · 624 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Flaherty

46 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Mary Flaherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 235
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Developmental Biology 13
Replace Michael P. Cannito with:
Michael P. Cannito United States
Linda J. Anooshian United States
Sendy Caffarra Spain
Debra Fine United Kingdom
Jeffrey Weihing United States
Ken Robinson United Kingdom
Kathy Wilson United States
Léslie Piccolotto Ferreira Brazil
Klaus Sarimski Germany
Neon Brooks United States
Mary Flaherty relative to Michael P. Cannito United States Michael P. Cannito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael P. Cannito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Flaherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Flaherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Flaherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Flaherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Flaherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Flaherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Flaherty. The network helps show where Mary Flaherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Flaherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Flaherty Line = papers co-authored together Mary Flaherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200566
2 200464
3 200163
4 200951
5 198843
6 201832
7 199131
8 202125
9 201525
10 200315
11 200015
12 201913
13 201413
14 201613
15 199612
16 200112
17 201711
18 202011
19 200511
20 200410

About Mary Flaherty

Mary Flaherty is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Signal Processing, having authored 50 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (8 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (5 papers), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (5 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (4 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (121 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations) and Developmental Biology (13 citations). Mary Flaherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nuala Brady, Mark J. Campbell, Emily Buss, Lori J. Leibold, Aidan Moran, Martin J. Connolly, Brian B. Monson, Steven Stern, John W. Mullennix and Lowell E. Schnipper. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Ear and Hearing, American Journal of Audiology and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact