American Journal of Audiology

1.3k papers and 17.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in American Journal of Audiology in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations. Papers published in American Journal of Audiology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (993 papers), Sensory Systems (587 papers) and Speech and Hearing (501 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (967 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (585 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (500 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Journal of Audiology are Robert Burkard, Donald G. Sims, Larry E. Humes, Gerhard Andersson, Richard S. Tyler, Wayne O. Olsen, Fred H. Bess, Vickie Thomson, Linda Thibodeau and Louise Hickson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Journal of Audiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Journal of Audiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Journal of Audiology.

Countries where authors publish in American Journal of Audiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Journal of Audiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Journal of Audiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Journal of Audiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025