Mary E. Lassaline

57 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mary E. Lassaline
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Equine 101
  • Ophthalmology 217
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 291
  • General Decision Sciences 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
Replace Christina Puff with:
Christina Puff Germany
Matt Kessler United States
Rebecca Wright United States
Annette M. McCoy United States
Tomas F. Bergström Sweden
Sabine Stoll Germany
Hanif Khalak Saudi Arabia
Eric M. Clark United States
Michael Ross United States
Dirk Janssen Spain
Mary E. Lassaline relative to Christina Puff Germany Christina Puff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36.2×
Christina Puff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Lassaline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Lassaline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Lassaline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Lassaline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Lassaline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Lassaline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Lassaline. The network helps show where Mary E. Lassaline may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Lassaline, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Lassaline Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Lassaline links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000155
2 199381
3 199675
4 200371
5 199963
6 200358
7 201058
8 199356
9 199652
10 200551
11 200649
12 200438
13 199638
14 200834
15 201732
16 199827
17 201925
18 201422
19 201919
20 201017

About Mary E. Lassaline

Mary E. Lassaline is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Small Animals, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Oncology Research (8 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (101 citations), Ophthalmology (217 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (291 citations), General Decision Sciences (33 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations). Mary E. Lassaline has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gordon D. Logan, Gregory L. Murphy, Dennis E. Brooks, Kirk N. Gelatt, Stacy E. Andrew, Nicole M. Scherrer, Kathryn L. Wotman, M. E. Källberg, András M. Komáromy and Rebecca R. Bellone. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Ophthalmology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Equine Veterinary Journal, Animal Genetics and American Journal of Veterinary Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact