Ann E. Dwyer

18 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Ann E. Dwyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Equine 37
  • Parasitology 101
  • Ophthalmology 75
  • Small Animals 41
  • Immunology 50
Replace Bianca S Bauer with:
Bianca S Bauer Canada
Carolina Naranjo Spain
Richard J. McMullen United States
Tammie L. Keadle United States
Steven J. Dugan United States
Kelly E. Knickelbein United States
K. Barnett United Kingdom
Vytautas A. Pakalnis United States
Christine C. Lim United States
Gerd Magdowski Germany
Ann E. Dwyer relative to Bianca S Bauer Canada Bianca S Bauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Bianca S Bauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Dwyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Dwyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Dwyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Dwyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Dwyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Dwyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Dwyer. The network helps show where Ann E. Dwyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann E. Dwyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann E. Dwyer Line = papers co-authored together Ann E. Dwyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 199599
2 199826
3 201222
4 201919
5 199317
6 201814
7 199211
8 20197
9
Immunopathology of pineal glands from horses with uveitis.
19997
10 20223
11 20222
12 20222
13 20212
14 20251
15 20121
16 20221
17 20201
18
How to take digital photographs of equine eyes in practice.
20101
19
How to obtain and interpret corneal cytology samples.
20170

About Ann E. Dwyer

Ann E. Dwyer is a scholar working on Parasitology, Epidemiology, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Equine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Leptospirosis research and findings (7 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (5 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (1 paper) and Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (37 citations), Parasitology (101 citations), Ophthalmology (75 citations), Small Animals (41 citations) and Immunology (50 citations). Ann E. Dwyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Μ. Kalsow, Thomas P. Nifong, Rebecca R. Bellone, Andrew W. Smith, Mary E. Lassaline, Christopher M. Reilly, S. Archer, David A. Wilkie, Bianca S Bauer and Molly E. McCue. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Genetics, Veterinary Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Current Eye Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact