Mary E. Hurley

627 citations
15 papers · 414 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mary E. Hurley

15 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Mary E. Hurley
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 126
  • Dermatology 84
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Occupational Therapy 13
  • General Health Professions 75
Replace Sally Stapley with:
Sally Stapley United Kingdom
Chrysoula Tsiou Greece
M. Martínez Spain
Sue‐Hsien Chen Taiwan
K. Stevenson United Kingdom
Warren Gillibrand United Kingdom
Kathy O’Leary Canada
Jo Gilmartin United Kingdom
Carrol Zhou Canada
Gülendam Hakverdioğlu Yönt Türkiye
Mary E. Hurley relative to Sally Stapley United Kingdom Sally Stapley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Sally Stapley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Hurley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Hurley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Hurley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Hurley. The network helps show where Mary E. Hurley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Hurley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Hurley Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Hurley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1994146
2
Classification of nursing diagnoses : proceedings of the sixth conference
198698
3 200287
4 200224
5 198922
6 198910
7 19926
8 19926
9 19933
10 19883
11 19943
12 19913
13 19931
14
Survey of eccentric vunerable adults living in the greater Dublin area
19971
15 20191

About Mary E. Hurley

Mary E. Hurley is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (1 paper), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (1 paper), Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper), Hip disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (126 citations), Dermatology (84 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations), Occupational Therapy (13 citations) and General Health Professions (75 citations). Mary E. Hurley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ian L. Guevara, Amit G. Pandya, Ellen M. Raney, John A. Ogden, Dennis P. Grogan, Judith J. Warren, Lois M. Hoskins, Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, Mary E. Kerr and Lynda Juall Carpenito. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Nursing Research, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Orthopedics, Journal of American College Health and Health Education Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact