Markus Lipp

42 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Markus Lipp's Hit Papers

Development and Application of a Database of Food Ingredient Fraud and Economically Motivated Adulteration from 1980 to 2010 2012 · 656 citations
6560+4+9Years since publication200400600

Peers

Markus Lipp
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Food Science 902
  • Horticulture 43
  • Analytical Chemistry 416
  • Animal Science and Zoology 264
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
Replace E. Anklam with:
E. Anklam Italy
Roberto Consonni Italy
Alain Maquet Belgium
Massimo Reverberi Italy
Hans‐Dieter Belitz Germany
José I. Reyes‐De‐Corcuera United States
Karl‐Heinz Engel Germany
Salvador Roselló Spain
Xiaohua Qi China
Raquel M. Callejón Spain
Markus Lipp relative to E. Anklam Italy E. Anklam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E. Anklam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Lipp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Lipp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Lipp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Lipp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Lipp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Lipp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Lipp. The network helps show where Markus Lipp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Markus Lipp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markus Lipp Line = papers co-authored together Markus Lipp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Development and Application of a Database of Food Ingredient Fraud and Economically Motivated Adulteration from 1980 to 2010
Hit paper breakdown →
2012656
2 1998293
3 2010188
4 2001139
5 2001113
6 200584
7 200674
8 200673
9 200672
10 199859
11 200652
12 199848
13 201947
14 199538
15 201737
16 199631
17 202419
18 199619
19 202018
20 201917

About Markus Lipp

Markus Lipp is a scholar working on Food Science, Spectroscopy, Plant Science, Analytical Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (9 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (5 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (902 citations), Horticulture (43 citations), Analytical Chemistry (416 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (264 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.0k citations). Markus Lipp has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey C. Moore, John Spink, E. Anklam, James C. Griffiths, Jonathan W DeVries, James D. Astwood, Tracey L. Reynolds, Branka Radović, Franz Ulberth and Karl‐Heinz Engel. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, European Food Research and Technology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry and Food Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact