Markos Valaris
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Historical Philosophy and Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 18
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 15
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (3 papers)Mind (3 papers)Synthese (2 papers)Ratio (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Markos Valaris
22 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Philosophy 155
- History and Philosophy of Science 46
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 97
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
- General Decision Sciences 5
Countries citing papers authored by Markos Valaris
This map shows the geographic impact of Markos Valaris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markos Valaris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markos Valaris more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Markos Valaris
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markos Valaris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markos Valaris. The network helps show where Markos Valaris may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Markos Valaris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 3 | Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason | 2008 | 26 |
| 4 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 8 | Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy | 2018 | 8 |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | Self-Knowledge and the Phenomenological Transparency of Belief | 2013 | 6 |
| 11 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 17 | Reasoning, Defeasibility, and the Taking Condition | 2020 | 1 |
| 18 | Time Travel for Endurantists | 2015 | 1 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Markos Valaris
Markos Valaris is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 193 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (155 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (97 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Markos Valaris has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Merritt and Stephen Hetherington. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind, Synthese, Ratio and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.