John Morrison
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Papers in
-
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 6
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 4
- Marxism and Critical Theory 3
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
-
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 3
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
- Co-authors
- David Anderson (1 shared paper)Benjamin Peters (1 shared paper)Nikolaus Kriegeskorte (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analytic Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Noûs (2 papers)Journal of Vision (1 paper)Synthese (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Morrison
17 papers receiving 110 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- History and Philosophy of Science 39
- Philosophy 88
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 73
- Theoretical Computer Science 7
- Cognitive Neuroscience 53
Countries citing papers authored by John Morrison
This map shows the geographic impact of John Morrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Morrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Morrison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Morrison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Morrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Morrison. The network helps show where John Morrison may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Morrison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1955 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 6 | THE RELATION BETWEEN CONCEPTION AND CAUSATION IN SPINOZA'S METAPHYSICS | 2013 | 10 |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 0 |
About John Morrison
John Morrison is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (4 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Marxism and Critical Theory (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations), Philosophy (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (73 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (53 citations). John Morrison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Anderson, Benjamin Peters and Nikolaus Kriegeskorte. Their work appears in journals such as Analytic Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs, Journal of Vision and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.