John Morrison

425 citations
14 papers · 96 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 3
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 2
    • Embodied and Extended Cognition 2
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 3
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 2

John Morrison

10 papers receiving 85 citations

Peers

John Morrison
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
  • Philosophy 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 46
Replace Thomas Raleigh with:
Thomas Raleigh Germany
Birgit Kellner Germany
Josh Weisberg United States
Ian Proops United States
Robin D. Rollinger Netherlands
Peter Küng United States
Derek Ball United Kingdom
Brandon C. Look United States
Heather Logue United Kingdom
Markos Valaris Australia
John Morrison relative to Thomas Raleigh Germany Thomas Raleigh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas Raleigh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Morrison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Morrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Morrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Morrison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Morrison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Morrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Morrison. The network helps show where John Morrison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Morrison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Morrison Line = papers co-authored together John Morrison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201641
2 195516
3 201713
4 20188
5 20136
6
THE RELATION BETWEEN CONCEPTION AND CAUSATION IN SPINOZA'S METAPHYSICS
20136
7 20143
8 20201
9 20131
10 20111
11 20230
12 20250
13 20210
14 20210

About John Morrison

John Morrison is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 96 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations), Philosophy (43 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (46 citations). John Morrison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Anderson, Benjamin Peters and Nikolaus Kriegeskorte. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analytic Philosophy, Noûs, The Philosophical Quarterly and British Journal for the History of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact