Mark Yates

23 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

Mark Yates
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • General Health Professions 98
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 15
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
  • Applied Psychology 16
Replace Hawa O. Abu with:
Hawa O. Abu United States
Yongzhong Sun United Kingdom
Danielle Clarkesmith United Kingdom
Enrico Caiola United States
Li‐Hong Wan China
Mi Hwa Won South Korea
Mahnaz Modanloo Iran
Maureen Godfrey United Kingdom
Camilla Young United Kingdom
Jayne Santos Leite Brazil
Mark Yates relative to Hawa O. Abu United States Hawa O. Abu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Hawa O. Abu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Yates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Yates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Yates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Yates. The network helps show where Mark Yates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Yates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Yates Line = papers co-authored together Mark Yates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201974
2 202020
3 200120
4 202116
5 201915
6 201114
7 201810
8 201710
9 20207
10 20144
11 20233
12 20213
13 20042
14 20052
15 20231
16 20231
17 20181
18 20241
19 20251
20 20241

About Mark Yates

Mark Yates is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (17 citations), General Health Professions (98 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (15 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations) and Applied Psychology (16 citations). Mark Yates has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Mesagno, Suzanne McLaren, Fergal Grace, Kyle J. Miller, Rapson Gomez, Anna Wong Shee, Dimity Pond, Henry Brodaty, Dianne Goeman and David R. Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, Neurobiology of Aging, Australian Journal of Rural Health, The Medical Journal of Australia and BMC Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact