Dimity Pond

3.8k citations
126 papers · 2.6k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Dimity Pond

122 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Dimity Pond
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 159
  • Dermatology 271
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 344
  • General Health Professions 371
  • Pharmacy 60
Replace John Marley with:
John Marley Australia
Gerd Glaeske Germany
Parker Magin Australia
Edith Burns United States
Judith E. Bosmans Netherlands
Olivier Chassany France
Carrie D. Patnode United States
C. Meghan McMurtry Canada
Anick Bérard Canada
W. E. Waters United Kingdom
Dimity Pond relative to John Marley Australia John Marley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
John Marley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dimity Pond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dimity Pond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dimity Pond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dimity Pond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dimity Pond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dimity Pond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dimity Pond. The network helps show where Dimity Pond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dimity Pond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dimity Pond Line = papers co-authored together Dimity Pond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Guidelines for Preventive Activities in General Practice
2012278
2 2018117
3
Psychological sequelae of acne vulgaris: results of a qualitative study.
2006106
4 2008102
5 200583
6 201265
7 199159
8 200556
9 200955
10 201555
11 201754
12 199654
13 201051
14 200348
15 201548
16 198747
17
Isotretinoin, depression and suicide: a review of the evidence.
200546
18 200244
19 201540
20 201134

About Dimity Pond

Dimity Pond is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (25 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (159 citations), Dermatology (271 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (344 citations), General Health Professions (371 citations) and Pharmacy (60 citations). Dimity Pond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Parker Magin, Jon Adams, Gaynor Heading, Wayne Smith, Ian F. Cook, Henry Brodaty, Ashley Kable, Andrea Mant, Günter Härtel and Nicholas A. Saunders. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Alzheimer s & Dementia, BMJ Open, Age and Ageing and Australasian Journal on Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact