Mark William Collison

13 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Mark William Collison
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 196
  • Biochemistry 54
  • Food Science 137
  • Analytical Chemistry 70
  • Organic Chemistry 143
Replace Chuangxing Ye with:
Chuangxing Ye China
Antonio Manuel Inarejos-García Spain
Yusuke Sawai Japan
Ren-Yi Yan China
Mark F. Oldfield United Kingdom
Yasumasa Sugiyama Japan
Chikako Masuoka Japan
Huai‐Fang Guo China
N. Olsson Sweden
Kobita Barua United States
Mark William Collison relative to Chuangxing Ye China Chuangxing Ye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Chuangxing Ye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark William Collison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark William Collison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark William Collison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark William Collison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark William Collison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark William Collison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark William Collison. The network helps show where Mark William Collison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mark William Collison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark William Collison Line = papers co-authored together Mark William Collison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2001183
2 2010117
3 200165
4 198663
5 200861
6 198556
7 198747
8 200725
9 201124
10 201223
11 201817
12 20188
13 20177

About Mark William Collison

Mark William Collison is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Food Science, Organic Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (4 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (3 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Food and Agricultural Sciences (2 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (1 paper), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper) and Food composition and properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (196 citations), Biochemistry (54 citations), Food Science (137 citations), Analytical Chemistry (70 citations) and Organic Chemistry (143 citations). Mark William Collison has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Padmesh Venkitasubramanian, Inmok Lee, Rory Alan Fisher, David C Woollard, Patricia Aikins Murphy, Paul W. Johns, Jan P. Hazebroek, R.C. Cantrill, Yoshinori Masukawa and Koichi Yasunaga. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of AOAC International, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact