Mark Visser

24 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Mark Visser
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Demography 100
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Health 42
  • Political Science and International Relations 113
  • General Health Professions 121
Replace Gerhard Naegele with:
Gerhard Naegele Germany
Fabian Kratz Germany
Elena Cottini Italy
Julia Bredtmann Germany
João Peixoto Portugal
Stéphane Mahuteau Australia
Tatyana Lytkina Russia
Kathrin Komp Finland
Maša Filipovič Hrast Slovenia
James H. Schulz United States
Mark Visser relative to Gerhard Naegele Germany Gerhard Naegele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Gerhard Naegele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Visser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Visser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Visser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Visser. The network helps show where Mark Visser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Visser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Visser Line = papers co-authored together Mark Visser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201377
2 201374
3 201648
4 202021
5 201821
6 201820
7 201320
8 201719
9 201413
10 201810
11 20227
12 20226
13 20235
14 20205
15 20224
16 20224
17 20193
18 20242
19 20232
20 20232

About Mark Visser

Mark Visser is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retirement, Disability, and Employment (13 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and demographic modeling and climate adaptation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (100 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Health (42 citations), Political Science and International Relations (113 citations) and General Health Professions (121 citations). Mark Visser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gerbert Kraaykamp, Peer Scheepers, Maurice Gesthuizen, M.H.J. Wolbers, Marcel Lubbers, Eva Jaspers, Tanja van der Lippe, Ellen Verbakel, Paolo Barbieri and Giampiero Passaretta. Their work appears in journals such as Work Aging and Retirement, European Societies, Economic and Industrial Democracy, European Journal of Political Research and Research in Social Stratification and Mobility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact