Ellen Verbakel

2.5k citations
65 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

  • Demography top 1%
    • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health top 2%
    • Health disparities and outcomes

Papers in

Ellen Verbakel

64 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ellen Verbakel
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Demography 339
  • Health 209
  • Gender Studies 217
  • Sociology and Political Science 878
  • General Health Professions 371
Replace Mikael Nordenmark with:
Mikael Nordenmark Sweden
Marybeth Mattingly United States
Natalia Sarkisian United States
Hiromi Taniguchi United States
Marieke Voorpostel Switzerland
K. Jill Kiecolt United States
Mattias Strandh Sweden
Brian Goesling United States
John Lievens Belgium
Nicole Watson Australia
Ellen Verbakel relative to Mikael Nordenmark Sweden Mikael Nordenmark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Mikael Nordenmark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Verbakel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Verbakel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Verbakel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Verbakel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Verbakel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Verbakel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Verbakel. The network helps show where Ellen Verbakel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Verbakel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Verbakel Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Verbakel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016175
2 2017146
3 2017141
4 201694
5 201086
6 201577
7 201471
8 201759
9 200952
10 202148
11 201241
12 201640
13 201439
14 201236
15 201436
16 201434
17 200730
18 201330
19 201629
20 202124

About Ellen Verbakel

Ellen Verbakel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Gender Studies, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (24 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (16 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (11 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (339 citations), Health (209 citations), Gender Studies (217 citations), Sociology and Political Science (878 citations) and General Health Professions (371 citations). Ellen Verbakel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P.M. de Graaf, Eva Jaspers, Silke Metzelthin, Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen, M.I. Broese Van Groenou, Inge Sieben, Matthijs Kalmijn, T.G. van Tilburg, Lizzy Winstone and Terje Andreas Eikemo. Their work appears in journals such as European Sociological Review, Journal of Marriage and the Family, European Societies, European Journal of Ageing and Work Employment and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact