Takero Doi

446 citations
20 papers · 265 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Takero Doi

16 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Takero Doi
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 111
  • Finance 80
  • Economics and Econometrics 184
  • Accounting 52
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Vanghelis Vassilatos with:
Vanghelis Vassilatos Greece
Jinho Jeong South Korea
Bernhard Schütz Austria
Jacques Le Cacheux France
Isabel Argimón Spain
Simcha Barkai United States
Juro Teranishi Japan
Akhand Akhtar Hossain Australia
Timothy F. Geithner United States
Andrzej Rzońca Poland
Takero Doi relative to Vanghelis Vassilatos Greece Vanghelis Vassilatos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Vanghelis Vassilatos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Takero Doi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Takero Doi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Takero Doi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Takero Doi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Takero Doi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Takero Doi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Takero Doi. The network helps show where Takero Doi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Takero Doi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Takero Doi Line = papers co-authored together Takero Doi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2011101
2 200150
3 200141
4 200217
5
The Public Sector in Japan: Past Developments and Future Prospects
200916
6 20098
7 20186
8 20035
9 20104
10 20233
11
New Evidence on the Median Voter Hypothesis in Japan
19983
12
Government deficits, political inefficiency, and fiscal reconstruction in Japan
20022
13 20142
14 19992
15 20071
16 20091
17 20021
18 20071
19 20021
20
Toward Reform of Local Bond System in Japan
20050

About Takero Doi

Takero Doi is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Accounting, having authored 20 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (8 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (7 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (7 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (111 citations), Finance (80 citations), Economics and Econometrics (184 citations), Accounting (52 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Takero Doi has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Toshihiro Ihori, Takeo Hoshi, Tatsuyoshi Okimoto, Kota Tsubouchi and Tomoko Hayashi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Annals of economics and finance, Japan and the World Economy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Asian Economic Policy Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact