Mark T. Johnson

23 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Mark T. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Clinical Biochemistry 77
  • Biochemistry 74
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 126
  • Genetics 96
Replace Majid Kheirollahi with:
Majid Kheirollahi Iran
Deborah Eaton United States
Kathryn Garner United Kingdom
Thomas Kaercher Germany
Elaine E. Thompson United States
Yuchen Shi China
Raúl Vélez-Montoya Mexico
Masaru Fukuda Japan
Kyung-Hoon Lee South Korea
Yu Kobayashi Japan
Mark T. Johnson relative to Majid Kheirollahi Iran Majid Kheirollahi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Majid Kheirollahi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Johnson. The network helps show where Mark T. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark T. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Mark T. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011152
2 2005102
3 200176
4 199775
5 200638
6 200628
7 200323
8 197720
9 199120
10 200512
11 20049
12 20207
13 20026
14 20195
15 19774
16 19784
17 20234
18
MODERN ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTIONS: WHEN TO USE THEM? A COMPARISON WITH SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
20034
19 19782
20 20242

About Mark T. Johnson

Mark T. Johnson is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Control and Systems Engineering, Oncology and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic control and management (3 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (2 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (2 papers), Biochemical Acid Research Studies (2 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (2 papers), Ferrocene Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (1 paper) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (77 citations), Biochemistry (74 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (126 citations) and Genetics (96 citations). Mark T. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mulchand S. Patel, Richard W. Hanson, Terry Magnuson, Anne Czechanski, Randall J. Roper, Leah Rae Donahue, Jeffrey P. Solzak, Yueming Ding, Cathleen M. Lutz and Muriel Trask Davisson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, American Heart Journal, Nutrition & Metabolism, Teachers and Teaching and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact