Nutrition & Metabolism

1.5k papers and 54.1k indexed citations

About

The 1.5k papers published in Nutrition & Metabolism in the last decades have received a total of 54.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nutrition & Metabolism usually cover Physiology (654 papers), Molecular Biology (386 papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (302 papers) specifically the topics of Diet and metabolism studies (359 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (258 papers) and Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nutrition & Metabolism are Milan Holeček, Thomas N. Seyfried, Stuart M. Phillips, Klaas R. Westerterp, Leigh Breen, Laura M. Shelton, G. W. M. Millington, Eric S. Freedland, Richard D. Feinman and M. Mahmood Hussain.

In The Last Decade

Nutrition & Metabolism

1.4k papers receiving 52.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Nutrition & Metabolism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nutrition & Metabolism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nutrition & Metabolism.

Countries where authors publish in Nutrition & Metabolism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nutrition & Metabolism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nutrition & Metabolism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nutrition & Metabolism more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026