Mark Richard

2.4k citations
51 papers · 834 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Richard

43 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Mark Richard
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Philosophy 539
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 568
  • History and Philosophy of Science 166
  • Language and Linguistics 156
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 98
Replace Max Kölbel with:
Max Kölbel Spain
David Braun United States
Manuel García‐Carpintero Spain
Jeffrey C. King United States
Seth Yalcin United States
Stefano Predelli United Kingdom
Dorothy Edgington United Kingdom
Daniel Rothschild United Kingdom
Peter Pagin Sweden
Peter Lasersohn United States
Mark Richard relative to Max Kölbel Spain Max Kölbel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Max Kölbel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Richard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Richard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Richard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Richard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Richard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Richard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Richard. The network helps show where Mark Richard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mark Richard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Richard Line = papers co-authored together Mark Richard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990161
2 2004123
3 2008118
4 198160
5 198356
6 199442
7 199328
8 198627
9 198225
10 201324
11 199517
12 199317
13 199811
14 198911
15 201311
16 200111
17 19878
18 20217
19 19877
20 20116

About Mark Richard

Mark Richard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics and Marketing, having authored 51 papers that have together received 834 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers) and American History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (539 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (568 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (166 citations), Language and Linguistics (156 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (98 citations). Mark Richard has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Forbes, Jan Večeř, Lynne Rudder Baker, Mark Crimmins, William G. Lycan, Nathan Salmón, John Burgess, David Peterson, George W. Wilson and Mark A. Faghy. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review, Linguistics and Philosophy, The New England Quarterly and Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact