Mark Crimmins
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 5
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 1
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Co-authors
- John L. Perry (1 shared paper)François Récanati (1 shared paper)Steven E. Boër (1 shared paper)Mark Richard (1 shared paper)Peter Ludlow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Mind & Language (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Linguistics and Philosophy (1 paper)The Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Crimmins
13 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 414
- Philosophy 335
- History and Philosophy of Science 106
- Language and Linguistics 108
- Cognitive Neuroscience 74
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Crimmins
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Crimmins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Crimmins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Crimmins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Crimmins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Crimmins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Crimmins. The network helps show where Mark Crimmins may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mark Crimmins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 215 | |
| 2 | Talk about beliefs | 1992 | 151 |
| 3 | 1998 | 74 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 11 | Philosophy of Language | 1996 | 2 |
| 12 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0 |
About Mark Crimmins
Mark Crimmins is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), AI in Service Interactions (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Educational Assessment and Improvement (1 paper) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (414 citations), Philosophy (335 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (106 citations), Language and Linguistics (108 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (74 citations). Mark Crimmins has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John L. Perry, François Récanati, Steven E. Boër, Mark Richard and Peter Ludlow. Their work appears in journals such as Mind & Language, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Linguistics and Philosophy and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.