Mark Remiker

567 citations
21 papers · 383 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Remiker

21 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Mark Remiker
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • Safety Research 54
  • Clinical Psychology 83
  • Social Psychology 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 140
Replace Natalia Salas with:
Natalia Salas Chile
Katarzyna Cantarero Poland
Michele K. Surbey Australia
Ilhong Yun South Korea
Joseph Hackman United States
Ulisses Ferreira de Araújo Brazil
Yueming Jia United States
Christine E. Stanik United States
Martin Kanovský Slovakia
Peter G. Sprengelmeyer United States
Mark Remiker relative to Natalia Salas Chile Natalia Salas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Natalia Salas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Remiker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Remiker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Remiker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Remiker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Remiker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Remiker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Remiker. The network helps show where Mark Remiker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Remiker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Remiker Line = papers co-authored together Mark Remiker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201064
2 200860
3 201243
4 201539
5 201331
6 201424
7 200922
8 202020
9 201819
10 200611
11 202410
12 20228
13 20217
14 20226
15 20175
16 20214
17 20223
18 20213
19 20222
20 20241

About Mark Remiker

Mark Remiker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Safety Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Safety Research (54 citations), Clinical Psychology (83 citations), Social Psychology (84 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (140 citations). Mark Remiker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Central African Republic and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include April Bleske‐Rechek, Shane J. Macfarlan, Robert J. Quinlan, Lyndsay A. Nelson, Heather J. Williamson, Krystal A. Klein, LeAnn Michaels, Samantha Sabo, Michelle R. Hribar and Heidi D Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Evolutionary Psychology, Current Anthropology, Aging & Mental Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact