George Pro

869 citations
51 papers · 556 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

George Pro

45 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

George Pro
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Health 70
  • Modeling and Simulation 33
  • Clinical Psychology 92
  • General Health Professions 94
  • Epidemiology 123
Replace Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli with:
Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli Malaysia
Norliza Ahmad Malaysia
Heidrun Thaiss Germany
Truong Quang Tien Vietnam
Nicole Schmidt Switzerland
Anli Leng China
Laura Medina‐Perucha Spain
Zaeem Haq Pakistan
Vuong Minh Nong Vietnam
Katherine LeMasters United States
George Pro relative to Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli Malaysia Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Pro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Pro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Pro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Pro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Pro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Pro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Pro. The network helps show where George Pro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Pro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Pro Line = papers co-authored together George Pro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201969
2 202150
3 202035
4 202034
5 202027
6 202023
7 201823
8 201422
9 202020
10 202020
11 201720
12 202018
13 202217
14 202316
15 202116
16 202013
17 202111
18 202110
19 201610
20
Substance abuse treatment in correctional versus non-correctional settings: Analysis of racial/ethnic and gender differences.
20199

About George Pro

George Pro is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (70 citations), Modeling and Simulation (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations), General Health Professions (94 citations) and Epidemiology (123 citations). George Pro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include Ethan Sahker, Julie A. Baldwin, Clare C. Brown, Ricky Camplain, Sean G. Young, Paul A. Gilbert, Nina Mulia, Toshi A. Furukawa, Sarah E. Zemore and Grant Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, American Journal of Public Health, PLoS ONE, Rural and Remote Health and Journal of Correctional Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact