Mark Power Smith

69 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark Power Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Condensed Matter Physics 962
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 488
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 282
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 589
  • Materials Chemistry 710
Replace Heikki I. Helava with:
Heikki I. Helava Russia
Bernhard Roas Germany
M. Schuster Germany
S.K. Bandyopadhyay India
J. E. Evetts United Kingdom
H. Kinder Germany
Evgeny Talantsev United States
Vladimir V. Kuryatkov United States
C. Lanzieri Italy
A. Usoskin Germany
Mark Power Smith relative to Heikki I. Helava Russia Heikki I. Helava's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Heikki I. Helava · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Power Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Power Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Power Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Power Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Power Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Power Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Power Smith. The network helps show where Mark Power Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Power Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Power Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mark Power Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012186
2 1996168
3 1996119
4 2003100
5 199691
6 200089
7 199781
8 199571
9 200560
10 199657
11 199555
12 199753
13 199651
14 199751
15 199648
16 200746
17 199535
18 200432
19 199523
20 199823

About Mark Power Smith

Mark Power Smith is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (22 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (20 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (15 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (14 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (11 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (9 papers) and Ga2O3 and related materials (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (962 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (488 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (282 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (589 citations) and Materials Chemistry (710 citations). Mark Power Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include H. X. Jiang, J.Y. Lin, G. D. Chen, Md Asif Khan, C. J. Sun, A. Salvador, Andrei E. Botchkarev, Richard McMahon, Matthias Voelskow and Hadis Morkoç. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Fusion Engineering and Design, Journal of Applied Physics, Fusion Science & Technology and IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact