Mark Peterson

3.7k citations
83 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Peterson

79 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Mark Peterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Language and Linguistics 561
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 587
  • Human-Computer Interaction 195
  • Literature and Literary Theory 280
  • Computer Science Applications 74
Replace Graeme Hirst with:
Graeme Hirst Canada
Douglas R. Hofstadter United States
John Airey Sweden
Richard Cox United Kingdom
Stephen P. Banks United Kingdom
James Simpson United States
Simon Penny United States
Laurence Anthony Japan
Randal Johnson United States
David Preiss United Kingdom
Mark Peterson relative to Graeme Hirst Canada Graeme Hirst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Graeme Hirst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Peterson. The network helps show where Mark Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Peterson Line = papers co-authored together Mark Peterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982282
2 2006121
3 2009108
4 2010104
5 201291
6 201285
7 200181
8 200964
9 201362
10 201061
11 201259
12 201652
13 199249
14 201243
15 198543
16 198342
17 198539
18
Digital gaming and second language development: Japanese learners interactions in a MMORPG
201138
19 201837
20 199734

About Mark Peterson

Mark Peterson is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (25 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (15 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (8 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (6 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (5 papers) and Digital Communication and Language (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (561 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (587 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (195 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (280 citations) and Computer Science Applications (74 citations). Mark Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. F. Schutz, Michael R. Matthews, E. Sackmann, Helmut H. Strey, William G Dixon, Maryam Sadat Mirzaei, Lucian R. Chirieac, Sı́lvio M. Zanata, Michelle Agostini and Jongchan Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Assisted Language Learning, The JALT CALL Journal, ReCALL, Physical Review Letters and CALICO Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact