James Simpson

3.7k citations
128 papers · 2.2k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

James Simpson

110 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

James Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Linguistics and Language 598
  • Language and Linguistics 724
  • Literature and Literary Theory 580
  • Classics 110
  • Human-Computer Interaction 91
Replace Wolfgang Klein with:
Wolfgang Klein Netherlands
Karl Bühler Germany
Charles F. Meyer United States
George A. Miller United States
Richard Smith United States
Mark Peterson United States
Stephen P. Banks United Kingdom
Roeland van Hout Netherlands
Steven J. Ross United States
David R. Russell United States
James Simpson relative to Wolfgang Klein Netherlands Wolfgang Klein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Wolfgang Klein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Simpson. The network helps show where James Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Simpson Line = papers co-authored together James Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011280
2 2018195
3 2011109
4 201785
5 200385
6 199683
7 198380
8 200575
9 199875
10
Reform and cultural revolution
200472
11 200356
12 201550
13 202050
14 201237
15 200534
16 199834
17 196434
18 199733
19 199629
20 197629

About James Simpson

James Simpson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 128 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilingual Education and Policy (27 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (22 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (16 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (11 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (9 papers), Education Systems and Policy (7 papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (7 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (598 citations), Language and Linguistics (724 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (580 citations), Classics (110 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (91 citations). James Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Suresh V. Garimella, Melanie Cooke, Jessica Bradley, Emilee Moore, George Grantham, Jonathan P. How, Mitchell S. Turker, Mike Baynham, Zhu Hua and Phillip A. Yates. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Applied Linguistics, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Numerical Heat Transfer Part B Fundamentals and ELT Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact