James Simpson

3.7k citations
97 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

James Simpson

84 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

James Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Linguistics and Language 290
  • Language and Linguistics 428
  • Literature and Literary Theory 343
  • Classics 71
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 40
Replace Karl Bühler with:
Karl Bühler Germany
Richard Smith United States
Stephen P. Banks United Kingdom
Steven J. Ross United States
Roeland van Hout Netherlands
Laurence Anthony Japan
William Morris United States
Cedric Linder Sweden
Michael Russell United States
Jie Hu China
James Simpson relative to Karl Bühler Germany Karl Bühler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Karl Bühler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Simpson. The network helps show where James Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Simpson Line = papers co-authored together James Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011224
2 201194
3 200383
4 198378
5 199874
6 199674
7 200564
8
Reform and cultural revolution
200458
9 200356
10 201747
11 196434
12 199834
13 197629
14 201229
15 200529
16 199728
17 200324
18 200222
19 200321
20
Esol: A Critical Guide
200821

About James Simpson

James Simpson is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilingual Education and Policy (19 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (13 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (11 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (11 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (9 papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (7 papers), Education Systems and Policy (6 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (290 citations), Language and Linguistics (428 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (343 citations), Classics (71 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (40 citations). James Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Suresh V. Garimella, George Grantham, Jonathan P. How, Mitchell S. Turker, Melanie Cooke, Phillip A. Yates, Jennifer Rose, Emilee Moore, Paul B. Robertson and Padmaja Mummaneni. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Applied Linguistics, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Numerical Heat Transfer Part B Fundamentals and TESOL Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact