Mark Pearson

3.1k citations
111 papers · 2.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Pearson

102 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 46
  • General Health Professions 566
  • Applied Psychology 70
  • Conservation 51
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 47
Replace Tannaze Tinati with:
Tannaze Tinati United Kingdom
Caitlin Marie Reardon United States
Anne Wilson Australia
Roberta E. Goldman United States
JoAnn E. Kirchner United States
Luciana Ballini Italy
Nicola Ring United Kingdom
Thomas J. Waltz United States
Angel Marie Chater United Kingdom
Heather Menzies Munthe‐Kaas Norway
Mark Pearson relative to Tannaze Tinati United Kingdom Tannaze Tinati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Tannaze Tinati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pearson. The network helps show where Mark Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015196
2 1986137
3 201596
4 201793
5 201068
6 201862
7 201558
8 201653
9 201551
10 200951
11 201649
12 202048
13 201748
14 201847
15 201447
16 201847
17 202041
18 202035
19 201933
20 201132

About Mark Pearson

Mark Pearson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Management Science and Operations Research, Rheumatology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (7 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (7 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (46 citations), General Health Professions (566 citations), Applied Psychology (70 citations), Conservation (51 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (47 citations). Mark Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rob Anderson, Simon Briscoe, Ruth Garside, Geoff Wong, Karen L. Mattick, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Nicola Brennan, Tiffany Moxham, Chris Cooper and Tamsin Jane Ford. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, PLoS ONE, Evidence & Policy, Systematic Reviews and Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact