Mark Pearson
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 12
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 8
- Co-authors
- Rob Anderson (10 shared papers)Ruth Garside (7 shared papers)Simon Briscoe (9 shared papers)Geoff Wong (10 shared papers)Chrysanthi Papoutsi (10 shared papers)Karen Mattick (10 shared papers)Nicola Brennan (6 shared papers)T Moxham (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (11 papers)PLoS ONE (6 papers)Evidence & Policy (5 papers)Systematic Reviews (5 papers)Palliative Medicine (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Pearson
87 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 45
- General Health Professions 442
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 44
- Conservation 46
- Speech and Hearing 63
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pearson. The network helps show where Mark Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 140 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 129 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 66 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 57 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 31 |
About Mark Pearson
Mark Pearson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (6 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (45 citations), General Health Professions (442 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (44 citations), Conservation (46 citations) and Speech and Hearing (63 citations). Mark Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rob Anderson, Ruth Garside, Simon Briscoe, Geoff Wong, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Karen Mattick, Nicola Brennan, T Moxham, Chris Cooper and Richard Byng. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, PLoS ONE, Evidence & Policy, Systematic Reviews and Palliative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.