Debra Bick

7.8k citations
219 papers · 4.9k · h-index 40

Impact in

Papers in

Debra Bick

209 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Debra Bick
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.1k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.3k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 757
  • Rheumatology 503
  • Clinical Psychology 567
Replace Lisa Kane Low with:
Lisa Kane Low United States
Eugene Declercq United States
Judith Lumley Australia
Holly Powell Kennedy United States
Jennifer Fenwick Australia
Maureen Heaman Canada
Patricia H. Shiono United States
Jo Garcia United Kingdom
Jennifer Zeitlin France
Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen Finland
Debra Bick relative to Lisa Kane Low United States Lisa Kane Low's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Lisa Kane Low · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Bick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Bick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Bick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Bick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Bick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Bick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Bick. The network helps show where Debra Bick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Bick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Bick Line = papers co-authored together Debra Bick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 219 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997265
2 2002212
3 2018173
4 2004131
5 2010127
6 2018126
7 2015111
8 2016106
9 1998102
10 201488
11 201984
12 201684
13 201279
14 201174
15 201774
16 200370
17 200969
18 201363
19 201461
20 201858

About Debra Bick

Debra Bick is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 219 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (47 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (43 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (32 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (22 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (16 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (12 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (757 citations), Rheumatology (503 citations) and Clinical Psychology (567 citations). Debra Bick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christine MacArthur, Jane Sandall, Marie Furuta, Sarah Beake, Yan‐Shing Chang, M R B Keighley, Louise M. Howard, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Sharin Baldwin and Marina Fontenla. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMJ Open, Maternal and Child Nutrition and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact