Mark Harcourt

55 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Mark Harcourt
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Public Administration 225
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 175
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 19
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 46
  • Demography 109
Replace Rosemary Lucas with:
Rosemary Lucas United Kingdom
Charles H. Fay United States
Sinikka Vanhala Finland
Noreen Heraty Ireland
Peter Gahan Australia
Sylvie Guerrero Canada
Andrew A. Luchak Canada
Jonathan Westover United States
Amanda Pyman Australia
Caroline Lloyd United Kingdom
Mark Harcourt relative to Rosemary Lucas United Kingdom Rosemary Lucas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Rosemary Lucas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Harcourt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Harcourt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Harcourt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Harcourt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Harcourt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Harcourt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Harcourt. The network helps show where Mark Harcourt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark Harcourt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Harcourt Line = papers co-authored together Mark Harcourt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200876
2 200776
3 200574
4 201372
5 200861
6 200342
7 200433
8 200731
9 200824
10 200223
11 201223
12 200020
13 200320
14 199815
15 201213
16 201912
17 200712
18 200712
19 201811
20 20149

About Mark Harcourt

Mark Harcourt is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (36 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (21 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (16 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (225 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (175 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (19 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (46 citations) and Demography (109 citations). Mark Harcourt has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Wood, Helen Lam, Adrian Wilkinson, Jenny Gibb, Gregor Gall, Elsa Underhill, Matt Flynn, Richard Croucher, Ian Roper and Stephen P. Keef. Their work appears in journals such as Economic and Industrial Democracy, Journal of Business Ethics, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of Economic Issues and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact