Mark Gardner

1.3k citations
38 papers · 865 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Gardner

36 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Mark Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 111
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 236
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 163
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 227
  • General Decision Sciences 17
Replace Gianna Cocchini with:
Gianna Cocchini United Kingdom
Yvonne Delevoye France
Laura J. Claxton United States
Gaetano Tieri Italy
Joseph Barrash United States
Laura Zapparoli Italy
Michaël Mouthon Switzerland
Ellen M.M. Jongen Netherlands
Giuliana Lucci Italy
Hideyuki Okuzumi Japan
Mark Gardner relative to Gianna Cocchini United Kingdom Gianna Cocchini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Gianna Cocchini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gardner. The network helps show where Mark Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Mark Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006237
2 1999164
3 202154
4 201041
5 201340
6 201237
7 201236
8 201329
9 201727
10 201624
11 201121
12 201221
13 201815
14 200915
15 201613
16 201613
17 201011
18 20189
19 20007
20 20217

About Mark Gardner

Mark Gardner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Automotive Engineering and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (111 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (236 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (163 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (227 citations) and General Decision Sciences (17 citations). Mark Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include C. J. Edmonds, Jillian Craigie, Ian Gold, Cordelia Fine, Nilli Lavie, Lucy Yardley, R B Potts, Petra C. Gronholm, Maria Flynn and Enrico Foglia. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Acta Psychologica, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Psychological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact