Mark G. Bures

3.0k citations
26 papers · 2.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark G. Bures

25 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark G. Bures
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 637
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 542
  • Biological Psychiatry 64
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
  • Organic Chemistry 425
Replace Ute Abraham with:
Ute Abraham Germany
Hugues‐Olivier Bertrand France
José Brea Spain
Agnieszka A. Kaczor Poland
Paolo Pevarello Italy
Leonid Breydo United States
Tao Che United States
Albert J. Robichaud United States
Su‐Ying Wu Taiwan
Douglas J. Sheffler United States
Mark G. Bures relative to Ute Abraham Germany Ute Abraham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ute Abraham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark G. Bures

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark G. Bures's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark G. Bures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark G. Bures more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark G. Bures

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark G. Bures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark G. Bures. The network helps show where Mark G. Bures may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark G. Bures, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark G. Bures Line = papers co-authored together Mark G. Bures links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005475
2 2000287
3 1993276
4 2016264
5 2005229
6 199684
7 199853
8 200651
9 201546
10 200539
11 200334
12 200428
13 199423
14 198820
15 201419
16 199018
17 199418
18 199116
19 201315
20 198515

About Mark G. Bures

Mark G. Bures is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pharmacology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers) and Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (637 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (542 citations), Biological Psychiatry (64 citations), Molecular Biology (1.2k citations) and Organic Chemistry (425 citations). Mark G. Bures has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philip J. Hajduk, Stephen W. Fesik, James A. Monn, Darryle D. Schoepp, Yvonne C. Martin, Chad J. Swanson, Michael P. Johnson, A. Linden, Isabella M. Lico and Katie Leach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Microbiology and Journal of Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact