Mark Esposito

73 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Mark Esposito
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Business and International Management 274
  • Marketing 430
  • Strategy and Management 709
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 153
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 203
Replace Annachiara Longoni with:
Annachiara Longoni Italy
Tatiana Beliaeva France
Matthew Johnson Germany
Concepción Garcés‐Ayerbe Spain
Mônica Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu Brazil
Elisa Truant Italy
Francesco Rosati Italy
Eglantina Hysa Albania
Jesús Ángel del Brío González Spain
Stefan Hoejmose United Kingdom
Mark Esposito relative to Annachiara Longoni Italy Annachiara Longoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Annachiara Longoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Esposito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Esposito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Esposito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Esposito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Esposito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Esposito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Esposito. The network helps show where Mark Esposito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Esposito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Esposito Line = papers co-authored together Mark Esposito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016277
2 2018231
3 2015131
4 200779
5 201257
6 201457
7 201754
8 200751
9 201635
10 202334
11 201732
12 201932
13 201528
14 201728
15 201427
16 201427
17 201825
18 200922
19 201721
20 201717

About Mark Esposito

Mark Esposito is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (6 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (274 citations), Marketing (430 citations), Strategy and Management (709 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (153 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (203 citations). Mark Esposito has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Terence Tse, Khaled Soufani, Sandeep Goyal, Amit Kapoor, Bruno S. Sergi, E. W. Guenther, F. Cusano, George Acheampong, A. P. Hatzes and M. Hartmann. Their work appears in journals such as Thunderbird International Business Review, Academy of Management Perspectives, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Journal of Management Development and California Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact