Thunderbird International Business Review

23.5k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

    • International Business and FDI 407
    • Innovation and Knowledge Management 179
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 190
    • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies 76

Thunderbird International Business Review

1.1k papers receiving 20.5k citations

Peers

Thunderbird International Business Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Strategy and Management 10.6k
  • Business and International Management 1.3k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 5.2k
  • Accounting 5.0k
  • Communication 3.1k
Replace Journal of International Management with:
Journal of International Management United States
International Studies of Management and Organization United Kingdom
Management International Review United Kingdom
Journal of Business Strategy United States
Scandinavian Journal of Management Sweden
Economy and Society United Kingdom
International Journal of Manpower United Kingdom
Strategy and Leadership United States
Management Research Review United States
European Business Review United Kingdom
Thunderbird International Business Review relative to Journal of International Management United States Journal of International Management's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of International Management · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Thunderbird International Business Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Thunderbird International Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thunderbird International Business Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review.

About Thunderbird International Business Review

The 1.3k papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review usually cover Strategy and Management (629 papers), Accounting (302 papers), Business and International Management (55 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (256 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (150 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (407 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (190 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (179 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (131 papers), Global trade and economics (114 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (114 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (97 papers) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Thunderbird International Business Review are Vanessa Ratten, Pawan S Budhwar, Vesa Suutari, Chris J. Brewster, Sylvie Geisendorf, Mark Esposito, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, Jaime Bonache, Cliff Wymbs and Elie Chrysostome.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact