Mark Edward King
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Papers in
-
- Mobile Learning in Education 4
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 3
- Co-authors
- Sam Winter (3 shared papers)Bob Fox (4 shared papers)Daniel Churchill (4 shared papers)Beverley Webster (2 shared papers)Paul K. Bergey (1 shared paper)Li Ling (1 shared paper)Michele P. Notari (1 shared paper)Jian Min Xu (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Mark Edward King
18 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Gender Studies 85
- Social Psychology 119
- Computer Science Applications 31
- Education 156
- Information Systems 101
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Edward King
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Edward King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Edward King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Edward King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Edward King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Edward King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Edward King. The network helps show where Mark Edward King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Edward King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | New Technologies in the Classroom: How We Can Understand the Link Between Strong Pedagogy, Student Learning, and the Application of New Technologies | 2012 | 4 |
| 16 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 18 | Maintaining a 'digital profile' under web 2.0 | 2013 | 1 |
| 19 | The Role of Secure Knowledge in Enabling Year 7 to Write Essays on Magna Carta. | 2015 | 0 |
About Mark Edward King
Mark Edward King is a scholar working on Information Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Learning in Education (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (85 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations), Education (156 citations) and Information Systems (101 citations). Mark Edward King has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Sam Winter, Bob Fox, Daniel Churchill, Beverley Webster, Paul K. Bergey, Li Ling, Michele P. Notari, Jian Min Xu, Yan Zhang and Paul J. Thibault. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Education, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, The Medical Journal of Australia, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education and Asia-Pacific Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.