Mark Earnest

1.6k citations
30 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Earnest

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Mark Earnest
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Family Practice 88
  • Health Information Management 171
  • Medical Terminology 6
  • General Health Professions 376
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 13
Replace Sara Poplau with:
Sara Poplau United States
Douglas H. Fernald United States
Sandra Applebaum United States
Tara F. Bishop United States
Ilana Graetz United States
Shira H. Fischer United States
Katie Coleman United States
Janice D. Walker United States
Michelle Myall United Kingdom
Marije Bosch Netherlands
Mark Earnest relative to Sara Poplau United States Sara Poplau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Sara Poplau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Earnest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Earnest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Earnest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Earnest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Earnest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Earnest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Earnest. The network helps show where Mark Earnest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Earnest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Earnest Line = papers co-authored together Mark Earnest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004239
2 2009194
3 2004170
4 2000136
5 200273
6 201152
7 201448
8 202040
9 200826
10 201725
11 202021
12 202014
13 202013
14 201110
15 201410
16 20199
17 20228
18 20197
19 19937
20 20166

About Mark Earnest

Mark Earnest is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (88 citations), Health Information Management (171 citations), Medical Terminology (6 citations), General Health Professions (376 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations). Mark Earnest has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Tan Lin, Stephen E. Ross, Loretta Wittevrongel, Laurie Moore, Shale Wong, Steven G. Federico, John F. Steiner, Barbara F. Brandt, Eva Aagaard and Daniel D. Matlock. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Interprofessional Care, New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact