Mark E. Williams

16 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Mark E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 39
  • Atmospheric Science 173
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Global and Planetary Change 169
  • Control and Systems Engineering 141
Replace Juan de la Fuente with:
Juan de la Fuente United States
Qian Sun China
David Adler United States
Do Van Dung Vietnam
Lajos Kullmann Hungary
Andrea Roth United States
Timothy A. Smith United States
Yuki Nakai Japan
Osmar Pinto Neto Brazil
Mark E. Williams relative to Juan de la Fuente United States Juan de la Fuente's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35.3×
Juan de la Fuente · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Williams. The network helps show where Mark E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1996185
2 1987182
3 1982138
4 200735
5 201432
6 198421
7
Office care geriatrics
20069
8 20209
9 20044
10 20034
11 20182
12 19972
13 19961
14 20171
15 20111
16 19911
17 19970

About Mark E. Williams

Mark E. Williams is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Reproductive Medicine and Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (1 paper), Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics (1 paper) and Garlic and Onion Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (39 citations), Atmospheric Science (173 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Global and Planetary Change (169 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (141 citations). Mark E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Houze, Wonjong Kim, David L. Trumper, Nortin M. Hadler, Jo Anne Earp, Karen I. Fredriksen‐Goldsen, Thomas C. Rosenthal, Bruce J. Naughton, Jonathan Evans and John L. Harwood. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Biochemical Society Transactions, Monthly Weather Review, Journal of Community Psychology and IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact