Mark E. Hurtt

81 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Mark E. Hurtt
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 898
  • Environmental Chemistry 499
  • Reproductive Medicine 325
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 597
  • Small Animals 231
Replace Diether Neubert with:
Diether Neubert Germany
Charles C. Capen United States
Rita K Loch-Caruso United States
Barbara J. Davis United States
Wan‐Yee Tang United States
Ling Song China
Olle Söder Sweden
T. W. Sadler United States
Sergei S. Makarov United States
Barry R. Zirkin United States
Mark E. Hurtt relative to Diether Neubert Germany Diether Neubert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Diether Neubert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Hurtt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Hurtt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Hurtt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Hurtt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Hurtt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Hurtt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Hurtt. The network helps show where Mark E. Hurtt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Hurtt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Hurtt Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Hurtt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996349
2 2001297
3 2006198
4 1995188
5 2003137
6 1988124
7 2005120
8 1992119
9 1990117
10 2003114
11 1994112
12 2003106
13 2012101
14 200376
15 200365
16 200562
17 198760
18 199058
19 200353
20 200551

About Mark E. Hurtt

Mark E. Hurtt is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine and Small Animals, having authored 84 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (17 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (16 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (11 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (9 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (898 citations), Environmental Chemistry (499 citations), Reproductive Medicine (325 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (597 citations) and Small Animals (231 citations). Mark E. Hurtt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gregg D. Cappon, Jon C. Cook, Tracey Zoetis, Lisa B. Biegel, Peter K. Working, John M. DeSesso, S. R. Frame, Robert E. Chapin, Jason C. O’Connor and Melissa Sherman Tassinari. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicological Sciences, Drug and Chemical Toxicology, Reproductive Toxicology, Birth Defects Research Part B Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact