Peter K. Working

90 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Peter K. Working
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Biomaterials 1.1k
  • Reproductive Medicine 635
  • Cancer Research 441
  • Oncology 749
  • Physiology 130
Replace Teni Boulikas with:
Teni Boulikas United States
Youngsok Choi South Korea
Thomas Klonisch Canada
Anna Riccioli Italy
Jessie L.‐S. Au United States
Yong Wang China
Yayi Hou China
Sanjoy K. Das United States
S. D. Conner United States
Mark Danielsen United States
Peter K. Working relative to Teni Boulikas United States Teni Boulikas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Teni Boulikas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter K. Working

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter K. Working's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter K. Working with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter K. Working more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter K. Working

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter K. Working. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter K. Working. The network helps show where Peter K. Working may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter K. Working, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter K. Working Line = papers co-authored together Peter K. Working links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996324
2 1999258
3 2006197
4 2004164
5 1994149
6 1994149
7 2004145
8
Pharmacological-toxicological expert report. CAELYX. (Stealth liposomal doxorubicin HCl).
1996142
9 1980139
10 1993126
11 1988124
12 1990116
13 1997109
14 1976106
15 1999104
16
Use of primary cultures of human hepatocytes in toxicology studies.
1989104
17 198890
18 198676
19 200275
20 200574

About Peter K. Working

Peter K. Working is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Biomaterials and Cancer Research, having authored 90 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (18 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (14 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (13 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (10 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (10 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (7 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (1.1k citations), Reproductive Medicine (635 citations), Cancer Research (441 citations), Oncology (749 citations) and Physiology (130 citations). Peter K. Working has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary S. Newman, Michael Amantea, Gail Colbern, Stanley Meizel, Mark E. Hurtt, Jan Vaage, Jerry L. Hedrick, A.D. Dayan, Francis J. Martin and James S. Bus. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Journal of Liposome Research, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Reproductive Toxicology and Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact